|
FAQS! FACTS! FAX! 559 (03/04/07)
Q. We have a new wireless router and as
the signal does not extend to all the computers in the house we need a device
(I can't remember the technical name), which bounces the signal on. I was told
that we needed one that would be compatible with our router but they seem to be
twice the price of all the others have found. I would like some advice on
whether or not this is true.
Wendy Shires, by email
A.
There are several exotic and often quite expensive ways to increase the range
of a home Wi-Fi system, including high-gain antennas, range extenders,
repeaters and signal boosters, however often the simplest solution is also the
cheapest and that is to reposition your wireless router. Mounting it up as high
as it will go on a wall often does wonders, as will moving it away from any
metal objects – a filing cabinet or radiator for example. Also avoid siting it
close to any other electronic devices, including your PC.
If that doesn’t help
then replace (or connect) an external antenna. The internal aerials and ‘rubber
duck’ antennas fitted to these devices are designed for close-quarters domestic
operation and are usually not very effective beyond 20 to 30 metres. Most
routers have an external aerial socket to which you can connect a larger, more
efficient or directional antenna. You should mount it where they will do most
good, in your loft or on the outside of your home. Incidentally, if you fancy a
challenge you could try your hand at making your own, with the Cantenna,
a home-brew directional Wi-Fi aerial based on a Pringles crackers tube…
Signal boosters also
plug into the router’s antenna socket. These are aerials with a built in
amplifier and they are usually ‘bi-directional’ which means they amplify both
the outgoing and incoming signal. Finally, as a last resort there are range
extenders or repeaters and there are several types but the most common ones are
stand-alone devices that are sited close to the limits of the router’s range
and act as a relay station, bouncing signals between the router and the remote
PC.
Q. I am looking at buying a desktop PC
with Windows Vista Home Premium pre-installed, 2Gb RAM and an Intel Dual Core
or a Core 2 Duo processor. Looking at the adverts in magazines and on the web
they seem to pre-install the 32-bit version of Vista; would there be any
advantage in having the 64-bit version? Apart from MS Office 2007 all of my
applications are 32-bit; will these run on a 64-bit operating system?
Alan Clarke, via email
A.
Microsoft Office 2007 and indeed more than 95 percent of commercial software is
designed to run on 32-bit systems, so no problems there. In fact you will be
hard pressed to find many exclusively 64-bit programs apart from specialist
applications and those designed for very demanding tasks like video encoding or
high-end design and graphics. In short a 32-bit system will be more than adequate
for all of your current and future needs. It is quite likely that within the
next few years, as more software becomes available, 64-bit PCs will become the
norm but for the moment it’s not something you need to worry about.
Q. You recently gave advice regarding
reducing the file size of photo attachments to e-mails. However, when I attach
photos they also appear in the body of the e-mail often greatly enlarged. The attachment can be opened normally, but
some recipients do not seem to realise this and think that I am at fault for
not sending normal sized pictures.
Grateful if you could advise as to how to prevent attached photos also
appearing in the body of the e-mail.
Bill Hall, via email
A.
This is the default setting when sending emails in Rich Text (HTML) format. You
have two options; you can either switch to Plain Text format or you can
manually remove the picture each time, and this is on the message box Format
menu, at the bottom. Simply uncheck the item ‘Send Pictures with Message’. To switch
permanently to Plain Text emails go to OE’s Tools menu then Options and click
the Send tab. Under Mail Sending Format select Plain Text then OK or Apply.
Q. I am trying to network my two computers
so that they can share my broadband connection. My Dell computer running Widows
XP Home edition with all current updates is the one that is connected to the
Internet. The second machine uses Windows 98 SE. I have installed a PCI network
adapter card in this computer and connected the two computers with a twisted
cable.
I have run the network connection wizard
as it instructs, including making a floppy disc to install the wizard on the
second computer. This second computer then asks me to go to the Start menu and
open My network places, doing this sends a message saying failed to install
wizard. I can get no further than this. I have not been able to share any files
either and I would appreciate any help or advice that you can offer.
Bill Pickin, via email
A.
Networking two PCs in this way for Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) is quite
tricky but it can be done. However, this type of direct PC-to-PC connection by
LAN (Local Area Network) cable only works when the cable is question is a
‘crossover’ type, as opposed to the normal ‘straight’ LAN cable. Maybe this is
what you meant by ‘twisted’ but in any event you should first check that you
have the right cable type.
The ICS Wizard is
unreliable and most times you have to manually configure the ‘client’ PC’s
networking protocols and TCP/IP address settings. It’s quite involved and I
suggest that you read through the very helpful article on the PC Annoyances website.
However, as I said it
can be a palaver; personally I wouldn’t bother, it’s much easier to use an
inexpensive router to connect the two PCs together by standard Ethernet cable
and connection sharing will be enabled virtually automatically on the Windows
98 PC.
---end---
© R. Maybury 2007 2703
|